Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This appeal has been decided on the record in terms of Section 89 2(a)(i) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]. Appellant was in Respondent’s employ as a gang leader before his dismissal on allegations of theft of gold ore. More

On the 10th of June 2011 Appellant was suspended from duty on the ground that he had fraudulently generated three (3) journals namely:- - Morgan Zintec for $406.00 - Chitungwiza Hospital for $459.95 - Dudzai Primary School for $550.01 without supporting documentation. This was an act of misconduct in terms of Section 20 of Respondent’s Code of Conduct S.I. 148 of 2009 the penalty of which is a dismissal for a first breach. For committing the above act of misconduct (fraud) Appellant was found guilty by the Disciplinary Committee and was dismissed from Respondent’s employment. He noted appeals to the... More

This is an application for late filing of an application for leave to appeal. The employee is opposed to the grant of such condonation relief. More

On the 7th October 2005 Arbitrator Chavura issued an award reinstating Applicant without loss of pay and benefits. Respondent appealed to this Court and on the 31st May 2007 an order by consent was issued on the following terms- - that Respondent reinstates Applicant pending early retirement with full benefits, - that Applicant be on leave pending finalization of his packages/emoluments - that there be no order as to costs. More

This is an application by applicantfor condonation of late filing of an application for review of both Disciplinary Committee’s and Appeal Committee’s proceedings. The application was set down for hearing on the 18th November 2020 at 10.00 hours but could not take off at the allotted time due to requests for postponement by Mr. Sengwayothe applicant’s legal practitioner then. The matter was stood down to 14:30 hours to enable the legal practitioner to go through the record and prepare. At 14:30 hours, applicant, now self-acting as the legal practitioner had renounced agency sought another postponement which was opposed by respondents. More