Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
At the hearing of this matter I dismissed the appeal and indicated that reasons would follow. These are they; This is an appeal against a decision of the Disciplinary Committee dismissing appellant. Appellant was employed by Metallon Gold Zimbabwe (Pvt) Limited which operates Shamva Mine. He was charged of theft, gross incompetency and gross negligence in terms of the Code of Conduct. Appellant, who was employed as a Senior Gang Leader was working in a shift in the Smelting Room in May 2015. He left his subordinates to work without supervision and gold slime was stolen. More

By a letter dated the 5th June, 2009, Appellant terminated Respondent’s contract of employment. More

This is an appeal against an arbitral award per the Honourable D. Munemo dated 23rd September, 2015. The Appellant seeks to have the award set aside in its entirety. The appeal is opposed. More

This is an appeal against the decision of the National Employment Council for the welfare and Educational Institutions, appeals committee. Background The respondent was engaged by the appellant as a Human Resources Officer. Allegations of misconduct were raised against her that she had misrepresented facts to Tear Fund. She was dismissed on 13 September 2021. The appellant (employer) stated that she had pleaded guilty to the allegations. She appealed to the appeals authority which set aside the dismissal penalty on procedural grounds and invited the parties to appear before it and make representation as to mitigation and aggravation. The respondent... More

This matter is an application for reinstatement of an appeal which was struck off the roll by Honourable Justice Makamure on 26 January 2015. The reasons for the order were delivered on 6 February 2015. The reasons given for the striking off were that there was no proper defendant cited, as the applicant had cited the Ministry of Agriculture which is not a legal persona at law. It was also observed that the applicant had raised grounds dealing with procedural irregularities which therefore qualified as grounds for review and not appeal. More