The second, third and fourth respondents did not appear for the hearing. They filed a document stating that they would abide by the decision of the court in these proceedings. More
The appellant in this case was employed as a teacher by the respondent.
He was accused of having proposed love to a school girl and sexually harassing the girl who was doing form 4 at Chikwira High School. More
Appellant was dismissed from Respondent’s employment for flouting provisions of the Respondent’s Code of Conduct.
The disciplinary proceedings that led to the dismissal were conducted in terms of Varichem Laboratories (Pvt) Ltd. Code of Conduct (THE CODE) which was duly registered by the then Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare on the 17th June 1994. More
This is an application for condonation and for extension of time within which to file an application for reinstatement of case number LC/H/APP/596/18.
At the hearing, the respondent raised several preliminary points which included that the application was fatally defective in several respects which included the following;
• That there was no proper affidavit in support of the application. It was submitted that the founding affidavit was not signed before a commissioner of oaths and the applicant herself who had filed the founding affidavit in her name, had not even signed the founding affidavit. It was also submitted by the... More
Appellant was in the employ of the Respondent as Finance Director. Following an audit of Respondent’s books of accounts, it was recommended that Appellant be charged with misconduct. Appellant was charged with contravening section 4 (a) of the Labour (National Employment Code of Conduct) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 15 of 2006 as read with the Public Finance Management Act, (PFMA) (Chapter 22:19). He faced nine (9) counts. Appellant was brought before a Disciplinary Authority which found him guilty of two of the counts and not guilty on the rest. Appellant is dissatisfied with this outcome and has appealed to this Court. More
