Appellant appealed to this Court against his dismissal from employment by Respondent. The appeal was made in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an application for condonation for late noting of an application for rescission of a default judgment.
The respondent raised two preliminary points for determination.
The first issue wasthat the application for condonation was not supported by the founding affidavit. To that extent there was no proper application for condonation for late noting of an application for rescission of a default judgment.
The applicant had no meaningful submissions to make in response. More
This is an application in terms of Section 92(F) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against my judgment LC/H/94/19 in which I dismissed applicant’s application for condonation and extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against my other judgment LC/H/469/17 in which I struck off applicant’s appeal for being prematurely before the Court. More
This is an application in terms of Section 92 E (3) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] for interim relief pending the hearing of an appeal against an arbitral award in favour of Respondent. The award was handed down on 16 September 2013 wherein Applicant was ordered to pay Respondent $6 279 within 30 days from the date of the award. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent’s appeals officer who confirmed appellant’s guilt and penalised him with dismissal. The background to the matter is that appellant attended a business workshop at Chinhoyi University hotel. After the workshop proceedings and after a cocktail which was given by his employer, appellant together with plus 14 colleagues congregated in a colleague’s room drinking and smoking and playing to loud music. More
