This is an appeal against an arbitral award which found as follows;
• “The contracts signed by the Claimants (Appellants herein) are in terms of Section 16(2) (b) of the Labour Act. The Claimants freely and voluntarily entered into contracts with less favourable conditions. The Claimants are bound by their signatures, caveat subscriptor rule. The contracts signed by the Claimants are valid and binding on the parties as far as grades, rates of pay and other benefits are concerned. Caveat subscriptor rule does not diminish right to length of service not lawfully terminated.
• The Respondent erred by not taking... More
This is an appeal against the appellant’s dismissal from employment by the respondent following certain misconduct allegations which were levelled against him. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent employer where it found applicant employee guilty of misconduct and penalised him by withholding his 2020 bonus and also by a final written notice. More
Appellant appealed to this Court against his dismissal from employment by Respondent. The appeal was made in terms of section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an appeal against an arbitration award made in favour of the respondent. The appellant was ordered to pay respondent a sum of $2 485.80.
The respondent was employed as a principal and a tutor by the appellant. At some point during the subsistence of the relationship a dispute ensued between the parties. It was alleged that respondent had opened an educational institution similar to appellant. Respondent was invited to a hearing and before the completion of the process the respondent referred the matter to a labour officer. It is unclear what transpired before the labour officer. However a... More
