The respondent was on 25 July 2001 offered employment to work for the appellant as Accountant Senior Bookkeeper (97 of record). Sometime in 2006 he was given a job as Accountant (page 94) and he accepted the job and its attendant duties. On 28 July 2010 he was appointed Finance Director effective from 25 July 2010. He was Head of Finance in the organisation and his responsibilities “remained the same”. He also became part of the Board of Directors. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award in terms of which the appellant was ordered to pay a total amount of US$7 158,06 to the respondent, as outstanding salaries and notice pay.
The brief facts of the matter are that the respondent was employed by the appellant as Human Resources Officer. The contract of employment was terminated on what appears on record to be a mutual termination of employment.
The respondent referred the matter to a Labour Officer for conciliation, alleging unfair dismissal. When conciliation failed, the matter was referred to compulsory arbitration, leading to the contested arbitral award. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against a decision of this court rendered on 4th December 2020 under judgement reference LC/H/296/20. The application is premised on section 92F (2) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] as read with rule 43 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. The application is opposed. More
This is an application for upliftment of the bar that is currently operating against the applicant who failed to file its heads of arguments as is required by the rules of this court.
Background facts are that on 8 September 2006 an award was issued by honourable Arbitrator in favour of the employee.
The employee was not reinstated and he applied for quantification of damages. The arbitrator in April 2011 quantified the damages in an award that the applicant is now seeking to appeal against. More
