This is an appeal against a decision of the Appeals Committee of the
21stJune 2013. Until the 10 May 2013 Appellant was employed by Respondent as a plant maintenance manager. He was charged of breach of the Company’s Code of Conduct Annexure II section 8.3 which reads “Negligence – failure to exercise proper care and regard to the manner of discharging of duty to the extent that tasks have to be repeated or equipment or persons are at risk of damage or injury.” More
This is an appeal against the decision of the appeal committee which upheld the decision of the staff disciplinary committees’ decision to find appellant guilty of an act of misconduct and to dismiss him from university employment. More
On the date of hearing this appeal, a preliminary point was raised by the respondent that the appellant had failed or neglected to comply with the order of the disciplinary authority. More
Applicant applied to this Court for the review of the termination of her employment by Respondent. The application was made in terms of Section 92 EE of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 (hereafter called the Act). Respondent opposed the application. More
