Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an appeal against the penalty which was imposed on the Appellant by the Respondent’s Disciplinary Authority and confirmed by the Public Service Commission. The facts of the case are that: The Appellant who was in the Respondent’s employ as a Deputy Headmaster was charged with contravening section 44(2(a) of the Public Service Regulations 2000 as read with paragraphs 2, 3 and 8 of the First schedule ( Section 2) of these regulations. More

This is an appeal against a misconduct determination and penalty by the Acting Permanent Secretary of the Respondent on 13 December 2010. More

The application for condonation was filed on 4 September 2020. The application was opposed by the Respondent. In his founding affidavit Appellant averred that he was a former employee of the Respondent. He was employed as a Research and Development Technician. He had been dismissed from employment on 29th of November, 2019 following a disciplinary process where he was facing charges of theft, embezzlement and misuse of company property. A Disciplinary Committee set up to hear the matter had found him guilty of all the charges levelled. An internal appeal was equally unsuccessful. He had then appealed to the National... More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Designated Agent for the National Employment Council; Harare Municipal Undertaking (NEC), issued on 19 March 2020. In the determination, the Designated Agent dismissed the appellants’ claim for allocation of 40 litres of fuel per week as a contractual benefit. The brief facts of the matter are that the appellants are employed by the respondent as Principal Auditors. They are placed in grade 6 on the hierarchy of posts. In terms of their contract of employment, the appellants are entitled to a company vehicle. The respondent also has a policy in terms... More

This is an application for review. The grounds for review stated that, “Grounds Of Review 2.1 The suspension of Applicant and any subsequent proceedings thereafter is a nullity as it is not in terms of the applicable registered Code of Conduct read together with the Urban Councils Act. It was improper for the employer to use the National Employment Code of Conduct. S.I. of 2006 given that there is an applicable registered code of conduct for Chitungwiza Municipality. Respondent is estopped at law from forum shopping codes of conduct. 2.2 it was grossly unreasonable and irrational for Respondent to suspend... More