Appellant appealed to this Court against his dismissal from employment by Respondent.
His grounds of appeal complained that,
“1. The Appellant was not accorded a fair hearing at the work place
and in particular the Respondent refused/neglected to release key witnesses.
The disciplinary proceedings were heavily, flawed and the principles of natural justice and fairness were not adhered to.
The Appellant did not receive adequate training and was not given proper induction. The decision to dismiss the Appellant is too harsh in the circumstances.
4) The Applicant (sic) was not afforded an opportunity to address the disciplinary committee in mitigation.” More
On the 17th May 2024 the Chief Designated Officer of the NEC for the Commercial Sectors issued a determination which ordered appellant to reinstate respondent’s employment. Appellant then appealed the determination to this Court in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called “the Act.” Respondent opposed the appeal. More
On the 17th May 2024 the Negotiating Committee (NNC) of the NEC for the Commercial
Sectors ordered appellant to reinstate respondent with full salary and benefits. Appellant then appealed the ruling to this Court in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. More
This is an appeal against a determination by the Chief Designated Agent of the Negotiating Committee of the National Employment Council for the Commercial Sectors of Zimbabwe( NECCSZ) which set aside a decision of the Local Joint Committee (of the NECCSZ) and ordered the appellant to reinstate the respondent with no loss of salary or benefits. This aggrieved the appellant leading to the present appeal . Three grounds of appeal are raised. These are that (i) the Negotiating Committee erred and misdirected itself in finding that the respondent was not dishonest and yet it was proven that he had deliberately... More
