This is an application for condonation for non-compliance with the Rules of this court and for an extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of review in terms of the same Rules. The application is not opposed by the 1st Respondent but is opposed by the 2nd Respondent. More
Appellant was employed by First Respondent as a disposal Supervisor. She was charged, found guilty and dismissed for breaching paragraph 9 and 13 (a) of the First Schedule of the Health Services Regulations 2006. The charges were of theft of, or making improper or unauthorized use of state property and corruption or dishonesty.
The facts giving rising to the charges were that on 14 June 2013 during a routine search at ward A6 entrance at Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals, appellant had been found in unauthorized possession of 10 ampoules of propofol, 1% Fresenius injection (20ml) and 10 sachets bacterex disinfectant... More
This is an application for the confirmation of draft ruling in terms of section 93 of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] (the Act).
At the hearing of this matter, two preliminary points were raised by the second respondent who is the employer party. I use the term employer party loosely bearing in mind that the second respondent disputes that it employed the 1st Respondents. More
In a judgment issued on 27 July 2023, this Court issued a judgment with the following Order: “1. The application for confirmation of the draft ruling is granted.
2. The draft ruling of Gracious Rutendo Chirendo N.O. is confirmed with the following amendment:
a. The claim for unlawful termination of the relocated fixed term contract is hereby granted.
b. The claimant shall be entitled to damages for the unexpired term of contract.’
3. Parties are hereby ordered to file submissions in respect of mitigation of damages and non-payment of salaries within ten (10) days from the date of this order.... More
This is an application for confirmation of a draft ruling in terms of section 93 of the Labour Act, (Chapter 28:01). The common cause facts are that the First Respondent was employed by the Second Respondent as a project manager for Mashonaland Province. Parties signed a contract to this effect which was supposed to expire in December 2019. Second Respondent later assigned other duties to First Respondent in Muzarabani. A contract to this effect was signed which was supposed to expire in April 2020. At the expiration of the latter contract no communication was made between the parties in written.... More
