On 17 November 2022, this Court issued an Ex Tempore judgment granting condonation to Respondent to file an appeal before this Court. Applicant is dissatisfied with the decision and intends to approach the Supreme Court on appeal. More
This is an application for review by Madziva (Applicant). The document that gave rise to this application is a response (THE RESPONSE) dated 13th February, 2014 by the Respondent’s human Resources Officer to Applicant’s legal practitioner’s notice of appeal dated 11th February, 2014 and addressed to Applicant’s legal practitioners. More
At the hearing of an application for review I reserved my ruling on points in limine raised by the respondent. This is it.
The agreed facts are that the applicant was employed by the respondent as a staff bus driver on a three months fixed term contract with effect from 15 January 2014. The last such contract signed by the parties was from 1 July 2014 to 31 September 2014. No contract was signed on 1 October until 9 December when the respondent approached the applicant to sign a new contract. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision rendered by this Court on the 24th of January 2025 under Case Number LC/H/1174/24 and Judgment No. LC/H/27/25. The application is brought in terms of section 92 (F) (1) of the Labour Act, [Chapter 28:01]. More
AND WHEREAS , In the 2nd paragraph and the 3rd sentence, that sentence reads: ‘Applicant was tried and found of guilty of theft and was subsequently dismissed from employment.’ AND WHEREAS , The sentence should read:
“Applicant was tried and found guilty of theft and was subsequently dismissed from employment.”
Judgment LCH/54/24 is accordingly corrected as indicated above. More
