After hearing submissions from Respondent’s Counsel, I dismissed the application for review with costs and indicated that my reasons will follow.
These are they.
The application proceeded in terms of Rule 19(3) (b) of this Court’s Rules 59/2006 in that Applicant having failed to file its heads of argument as required in terms of Rule 19 was barred. More
This is an application for the rescission of the default order under case number LC/H/ORD/611/2018 that was handed down on 20th and 27th June 2018.
The brief facts of the matter are that the Applicant was employed as a Finance Manager on the 1st of July 2017 on a fixed term contract of (1) one year (6) six months. The first two (2) months were the probation period which the employer could terminate on two weeks notice. The contract was terminated on notice just 5 weeks into the contract. Aggrieved by the decision applicant took up the matter to the... More
Applicant in the matter at hand on 29 August 2024 filed with this court an application which he calls an application for condonation for late filing of reinstatement. In his founding affidavit on paragraph 3 he calls it an application for condonation for late filing of appeal for unpaid salaries from respondent. More
This is an appeal against a decision by a designated agent (DA) under the Collective Bargaining Agreement for the Catering Industry (CBA Catering). More
This is an appeal against a decision by the respondent’s Appeals Committee wherein it confirmed the appellant’s dismissal from respondent’s employment.
The appellant was a revenue specialist. Her duties included ensuring that long distance trucks passing through the Nyamapanda Border Post are proved to have left the country with their goods and are proceeding to a destination outside Zimbabwe. This meant that once the trucks had passed through the Border Post she would advise the Beitbridge Border Post to that effect. The Beitbridge Border Post acted solely on the basis of that communication. The reason is that for the period... More
