The appellant was employed by the respondent until the 16th of January 2015 when he was dismissed from employment following a disciplinary hearing.
The background to this case is not in dispute. Appellant was employed as a section manager within the Commercial Layers Division. Prior to her transfer to that section, appellant worked at the Hatchery as an assistant manager.
While working at the Hatchery she was charged for misconduct and found liable. She was issued with a final written warning coupled with a transfer to the Commercial Layers Division. The warning was valid for twelve months. This was in... More
After hearing both counsel and having read the documents filed of record the court dismissed the appeal on the basis of a point in limine that was raised. The reasons were read in court and these are the written reasons for the dismissal of the appeal. More
Rule 25 of the Rules of this Court, Statutory Instrument 150 of 2017 (The Rules) provides for representation of parties, assumption and renunciation of agency More
This is an appeal against the decision of respondent’s Appeals Committee which found appellant guilty of gross negligence in the performance of his duties and dismissed him from employment.
Appellant was employed by the respondent as a revenue officer and was stationed at Nyamapanda Border Post.On 16 December 2012 the appellant was assigned duties in the motor traffic section at the search bay. He was working with three other officers and his duties included receiving duly processed export documents from the Commercial Office and the carrying out searches/physical examinations of consignments being exported and the vehicles exporting the consignment. More
This is an application for confirmation of a draft order made by the applicant. It is being made in terms of section 93 (5a) (a) & (b) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:07].
The application was granted. The following are the reasons.
The facts of this matter which appear to be largely common cause are as follows. The
1strespondent dismissed the 2ndrespondent from employment. Such dismissal was reversed after the 2nd respondent had formally complained of unlawful termination of employment. The termination was done on 29 August 2016 and it was reversed on 16 November 2016. This means that the1st... More
