2. The second and third respondents were employed by the first respondent on a permanent basis i.e contract without limit of time. They were employed as section managers at one time. They were moved to the head office into the office of buying clerks. The post of buying clerk is a higher post than that of section manager. It is a post with new responsibilities. There was an increase of ZWL90-00 in salary. There was no paperwork to effect the movement to the new post. There were no other benefits that were paid. The two respondents claimed that in actual... More
The applicant was employed by the respondent as a battery charger based in Norton. The applicant was suspended from employment sometime in January 1998 on allegations of misconduct. The applicant has lodged this particular application because he alleges in his founding affidavit that this honorable court declined to rescind judgment number LC/H/130/23. The applicant also alleges that the same judgment was obtained through fraud. The applicant has brought forward this present application for leave to appeal in a bid to appeal against the honorable court’s decision to dismiss his application for rescission for default judgment. More
This is an application for quantification of damages. In this case the applicant successfully applied for a review of the disciplinary proceedings which were carried out by the respondent employer, which proceedings saw his dismissal. More
Two issues are the subject of this review. These are:-
(1) Whether a referral to the company executive was unlawful and
(2) Whether or not the court can order reinstatement. More
On 2 October 2014 at Harare, arbitrator C TKadenga issued an arbitration award. She ordered respondent to pay appellant an amount of USD423.52 for leave days. Appellant then appealed to this court. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
