Appellant was charged with misconduct in terms of section 44(2)(a) as read with paragraphs 8, 9 and 24 of the first schedule of the Public Service Regulations 2000 Statutory Instrument 1/2000. More
On 26 July 2016 I struck off an application for condonation filed by the applicant. Applicant requested for reasons and these are they. The applicant applied for condonation of late noting of an application for rescission of judgment.Before the matter proceeded into the merits the respondent raised a preliminary point that the applicant is approaching the court with dirty hands and therefore should not be heard. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the N.E.C. Banking and Industry undertaking where it ordered the now Appellant to reinstate the Respondent without any loss of salary and benefits.
Facts of the case are that Respondent was employed as a crown banker with the Respondent’s Newlands branch at the time of the alleged misconduct. She is said to have on separate occasions processed a fraudulent transaction and failed to verify a client’s signature resulting in the branch losing US$2,300 and $8,500 respectively. As a result of the above conduct she was charged with a contravention of section 11... More
The Respondent, an employee of the appellant was embroiled in a dispute with his employer. The Respondent was employed at the Appellant’s Treasury department. More
