This is an application for the review of the respondent’s disciplinary committee decision. Applicant raises 3 issues for review. The first one is that he was wrongly charged under the Tourism Industry Code instead of under the Procurement Act. Secondly he says that the Chairman did not have jurisdiction to hear his matter as he was biased on account of the fact that he was husband to applicant’s superior. Thirdly he argues that the complainant in the matter was his immediate supervisor and signatory to the procurement process now under challenge so he gave a biased account of the events... More
This is an appeal against the arbitral award by Honourable J Mateko that was handed down on 4 September 2015. The appellants were employed by the respondent for a period of (9) nine years as security guards. They were then retired after reaching the age of 65 years. They then approached the arbitrator with the claim that they had been unfairly dismissed. The arbitrator dismissed their claim stating that termination was done fairly on retirement. More
This is an application for rescission of judgment. In considering applications of this nature, the court is to consider generally whether or not there has been a reasonable explanation for the default and also whether the applicant has good prospects of success on the merits. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award wherein the arbitrator found that the respondent had committed minor acts of misconduct and thereafter set aside the penalty of dismissal and ordered the appellant to reinstate the respondent. This aggrieved the appellant. More
This appeal is mainly centred on the interpretation of the phase “effective date” as used by the Arbitrator. Appellant had raised four (4) grounds of appeal but has since abandoned some grounds leaving these two, that: More
