At the hearing of this matter, the parties agreed that the court should proceed to hear the application for review first.
The applicant was in this case employed in a managerial position by the respondent. She was alleged to have committed several acts of misconduct. A hearing was conducted and the applicant was found guilty and dismissed.
She was aggrieved by the decision to both find her guilty and to dismiss her. She noted an appeal with the Appeals Committee. More
On 14 March 2023, the Supreme Court set aside this Court’s judgment and made the following Order:
“1. The appeal be and is hereby allowed with costs.
2. The judgment of the court a quo be and is hereby set aside and substituted with the appeal be and is hereby allowed. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award in favour of respondent. Appellants were employed by respondent. Initially they were employed by Air Zimbabwe Holdings Ltd. In 2009 appellants were sent notices of intention to retrenchment. The retrenchment was challenged and there were protracted negotiations. Subsequently retrenchment packages were agreed to on an individual basis. Air Zimbabwe Holdings disbanded in 2012 forming respondent and Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd. More
Four preliminary points were raised for the respondents that the appellants were fugitives from justice they should not be heard, that the grounds of appeal raise procedural issues therefore an application for review should have been made, that the grounds of appeal donot raise questions of law and that the appellant waived their right to appeal. More
