Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an application by a designated agent, for the confirmation of his draft ruling. It is in terms of section 93 (5a)(a) and (b) of the Labour Act, Chapter 28:01 (the Act). The first respondent (the employer) raised two points in limine to the application. The first point is that the designated agent is not a labour officer and therefore may not apply for confirmation of his draft order in terms of section 93 of the Act. The second point is that the second respondent did not exhaust the local forum in terms of the workplace code of conduct. More

This is an application for what the applicants describe, in their Notice of Application, as: “5. QUANTIFICATION OF APPLICANTS’ CLAIM 5.1 Payments of Terminal Benefits due and allowances and benefits to which they are duly entitled. 5.2 Payment of a termination settlement equating to thirty-six months’ salary as compensation for loss of future earnings. 5.3 Payment of punitive damages for emotional and psychological trauma and hardship suffered. More

This is an appeal against a determination made by the respondent‘s Disciplinary Authority which resulted in his dismissal from employment. The determination was handed down on an unspecified date in 2021. The appeal is opposed. More

This is an application forcondonation for late filing of an appeal and extension of time within which to note the appeal. More

At the commencement of the appeal before this Court, Respondent raised two points inlimine.The points were that; 1. Appellants were barred for failure to file their Heads of Argument timeously; and 2. The matter was resjudicata. More