Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an application asking this court “to issue an order to force the 1st Respondent to issue out an arbitral award that meets the requirements of Labour Act [Cap 28:01] section 98 subsection 14” The Applicant avers that the arbitral award granted by Honourable J.T. Mawire on September 2010 does not comply with section 98 (13) and (14) of the Labour Act, in that it does not sound in money. He now wants this court to issue an order compelling the Arbitrator to issue an order that sounds in money. More

The appellant was employed as a general hand by the respondent and was stationed at Marondera Provincial Hospital. The respondent charged him with an act of misconduct. It was alleged in a letter dated 18 July 2022 that he was being charged with an act of misconduct in terms of the Labour National code of Conduct Regulations Statutory Instrument 15/2006, Section 4 paragraph (d) which reads “theft or fraud” More

This is an appeal against a decision of Respondent Disciplinary Authority handed down on 28th April 2015.FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Appellant was employed as Head of Chikukwa Primary School in Mutoko. On the 30th of May 2014 the 1st Respondent levelled a charge of misconduct in terms of section 44(2) as read with paragraph (2) (8) and 24 of the First Schedule (Section 2) of the Public Service Regulations, 2000 (thereafter referred to as the regulations). More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Arbitrator where he ordered the reinstatement of the Respondent by the Appellant company following allegations of a breach of the Respondent’s Code of Conduct. Facts of the case are that Respondent who was in Appellant’s employ as a Finance Manager was sent on paid leave on 5th October 2012 and suspended on 19th November 201 on allegations that he had breached the Respondent’s Code of Conduct. More

On 12 September, 2007 the Respondent was suspended on allegations of contravening Section 4(a)of Statutory Instrument 15 of 2006 for“an act of conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfillment of the express or implied conditions”of employment. The disciplinary hearing was set for 18 September, 2007. On 18 September, 2007, The Respondent tendered his resignation. He said he had decided to go on early retirement and therefore would want to resign with immediate effect. The last sentence in the letter then said “Please feel free to discuss the Exit Package with me.” The letter was received by the Appellant’s officials on... More