This is an application for interim Relief as provided for in section 92 E(3) of the Labour Act [Cap 28:01] as read with section 17 of the Labour Court Rules (SI 159/06). More
Appellant’s prayer in her claim before the Arbitrator was that since she was then employed on a contract without limit of time, she was entitled to three months’ notice of $2 700,00.
The term of reference to the Arbitrator which the Arbitrator considered was –
“whether or not claimant had a legitimate expectation that her contract of employment would be renewed for a further period of 6 months.
If so, the remedy thereof.” More
Appellant was arraigned before a Disciplinary Committee on 6 charges in terms of the 1st schedule of the Public Service Regulations S.I. 1/2000 (The Regulations). Four of the charges were found to have been proven, and as a result the Disciplinary Authority discharged her from the Respondent’s employ. More
Appellant was aggrieved by the National Employment Council Appeals Board’s decision upholding Respondent’s decision to transfer him from Harare to Hwange and has approached this Court seeking a reversal of the transfer. More
Applicants have approached this Court for rescission of the judgment granted in favour of Respondent on 28 January, 2013. Applicants allege that they were not aware of the Court date as they were not served. The application for rescission was made on 25th February, 2013 but has managed to be heard some eight (8) months later. This speaks volumes on the administration of justice and what the beneficiaries of the system must think of it. More
