This is an appeal against the decision of the Institute Board to dismiss the appellant from employment.
The brief history of this matter is that appellant a lecturer in the Pharmaceutical Technology department around August 2015 started conducting lectures for two foreign students from Namibia without the requisite authorisation. He made the students to pay $200 for the ten lessons he delivered to them. He was charged for contravening Section 9:4:2 of the Disciplinary and Grievance Handling Procedural which reads that
“Any act of conduct or omission inconsistent of the express or implied conditions of his contract.” More
On 17th October 2011 this Court made an order by default in favour of Respondent. On 18th October 2011 Applicant filed the present application for rescission of the order. Respondent opposed the application. More
On the 13th of July, 2012 this Court granted an order by default in favour of the Respondent. The Applicant has filed the present application for rescission of that order, upliftment of the bar and condonation for the late filing of heads of argument. The application is opposed. More
The appellant was employed by the respondent company as a miner surveyor. She was charged with acts of misconduct. Disciplinary proceedings were conducted against her . She found guilty. She was penalized with dismissal. Her appeal internally failed. More
Applicant worked for Respondent as a teacher in Harare. She was dismissed from employment for misconduct. She appealed to respondent’s Appeals Officer who dismissed the appeal on the 16th June 2022. On the 8th July 2022 she appealed to this Court. The matter proceeded under reference LC/H/595/22 until applicant withdrew the appeal on the 17th October 2022. The present application was then filed on the 24th October 2022. Rule 19(1) of the Court’s Rules requires that an appeal should be filed within 21 (twenty-one) days of the impugned order. Therefore, the intended appeal in case is 3 months out of... More
