On 9 May 2014 this Court, dismissed Applicant’s application for rescission of the judgment of MUZOFA J which had been handed down on 30 January 2014. Applicant is dissatisfied with that decision and seeks to approach the Supreme Court. This is an application in terms of section 92F of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]. The basis of the appeal is that the Court did not give due weight to Applicant’s written submissions in considering the prospects of success. Further, it was averred that the Supreme Court should be requested to correctly state the interpretation and applicability of Rules 19 and... More
This is an application for rescission of judgment granted by MUZOFA J. on 30th January 2014.
The brief background of this matter are that Applicant and Respondents appeared before PRESIDENT NDEWERE (as she then was) on 20th June 2013 where Applicant applied for time to file Heads of Argument. This application was granted. Applicant did not file Heads of Argument until 4th October 2013. Meanwhile the Respondents had made an application in terms of Rule 19 on 5th September 2013 and on 29th November 2013 the Registrar wrote to Respondents to address certain issues in that application. The application by... More
Appellants appealed against a number of arbitration awards issued against them at the instance of Respondent. The matters involved essentially the same question. Hence the parties sought and obtained the consolidation of the appeals into one matter. They then filed a statement of agreed facts dated 27th August, 2014 which was signed by both parties and filed of record. More
This is an urgent application for stay of execution in terms of section 92E (3) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 as read with Rule 18 Labour Court Rules 2017. The applicant seeks to have stayed an arbitral determination made by Arbitrator Honourable Gadaga on 5 August 2024. The award ruled that applicant employer pays to its employees who are represented by the respondent workers’ Union a total of USD 787 413 and ZIG 1 771 686 as outstanding salaries and allowances. The grant of stay relief is opposed by the respondent Union. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award handed down on 16 November 2015, in terms of which it was ruled that the respondent’s members are entitled to bonus payments in terms of their conditions of service. More
