This is an application for condonation of the late filing of an application for rescission of a default judgement handed down under Case NumberLC/H/LRA/700/18. The application is opposed by 2nd and 3rdRespondents.
By way of background the 1st and 2nd Respondent were employed by the Applicant. The Applicant concedes this position in respect of 1stRespondent but however contests this position in respect of 2nd Respondent. The two Respondents referred a claim of unlawful retrenchmentto the Designated Agent, Tichafara R. Viriri; they were thus claiming for cash in lieu of leave days, underpayments and compensation for loss of employment. More
This is an application for stay of execution of an arbitral award granted on 30th September 2013, in which damages were quantified and amounted to a total of US$491 760.00. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award in terms of which the Appellant was ordered to reinstate the Respondent without loss of salary and benefits, or pay him damages in lieu of such reinstatement. The arbitral award overturned a decision of the Appellant’s Disciplinary Committee which had found the Respondent guilty of misconduct and dismissed him from employment. More
This is an application for condonation for late filing of an application for review.
The brief facts are that applicant was in the employ of respondent. He was charged with fraud in that he submitted fraudulent receipts with his Travelling and Subsistence claim. The Regional Hearing Committee (RHC) found him guilty and recommended his dismissal. He appealed to the National Hearing Committee (NHC) which dismissed his appeal. He did not file his application for review timeously, hence this application. More
On the 4th of July, 2023 at Harare, G. Mudzengi in his capacity as a Designated Agent (DA) issued a determination. He ordered appellant (employer) to reinstate respondent (employee) or pay him damages in lieu of reinstatement. The employer then appealed the determination to this Court in terms of section 92 D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called the Act. The employee opposed the appeal. More
