Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an application for condonation for late noting of an appeal against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee that was handed down on 24 May 2019. The Disciplinary Committee found the applicant guilty of all the three charges that were raised against her and she was dismissed from employment. More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Hearing Officer who found Appellant guilty of misconduct culminating in his dismissal from employment. More

This is an appeal against an arbitral award handed down on 15 July 2012, in terms of which the appellant’s dismissal for various acts of misconduct was upheld. The factual background to the matter can be summarised as follows. The appellant was employed by the respondent as Operations Manager. In the papers on record, his position is variously described as General Manager, General Manager of Operations and Operations Manager. Whatever the precise designation is, the record shows that he was head of the respondent’s operations in Zimbabwe. The respondent is headquartered in South Africa, and also carries on business in... More

The Appellant was employed by the Respondent in 2005 as an International Bus Driver. He was dismissed from employment with effect from 17th of April, 2012 following his conviction on a charge of violating Sections 1.1 and 2.3 (GrossNegligence) of the relevant Code Statutory Instrument 94 of 1995. The allegations were that on the 2nd of March, 2012 the Appellant was involved in an accident whilst operating one of Respondent’s buses. The Appellant appealed to the Managing Director whichappeal was dismissed. Aggrieved the Appellant has noted his appeal against that decision with the Labour Court. More

On 11th December 2023 at Harare, Designated Agent A Chimedza issued a determination. He ordered appellant to reinstate respondent or pay him damages in lieu of reinstatement. Appellant then appealed the determination to this Court. The appeal was made in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01(hereafter called the Act). Respondent opposed the appeal. More