Respondent stated that appellant’s attorney Mr Gwanyanya does not have right of audience in this Court as he did not file an Assumption of Agency. In response Gwanyanya stated that he uploaded an Assumption of Agency on 23 January 2024. A hard copy was produced. The point arose presumably because the appeal was filed by the employers association on behalf of appellant. However now that the Assumption has been filed albeit belatedly the point falls away. In any event respondent did not allege or prove any prejudice it suffered thereby. More
A brief background of the matter which has brought about this appeal, is that Respondent was Appellant’s employee as an Accounting Assistant Projects as from October, 2009. Prior to that he had been moved from Appellant’s employ to Zinwa and back after having joined Appellant in 1996.
On the 26th February, 2010 Respondent appeared before a Disciplinary Committee to answer nine charges of acts of misconduct. The Disciplinary Committee found him guilty of the said charges and he was dismissed from Appellant’s employ. More
This is an application for condonation of late filing of an application for leave to appeal against a decision of this court as well as an application for extension of time within which to file the application for leave to appeal. More
This is an application for the confirmation of a ruling in the matter between Johnson Mapira and Moreyear Investments Company. The background to the matter is that Mapira lost his job with Moreyear on notice. Aggrieved by the job loss he approached a labour officer who ruled that the termination on notice was not regular as it was not in sync with the law set out in Sec 12(4)(a) to (d) of the Labour Amendment Act. More
On the 7th September 2023 respondent’s Disciplinary Authority (DA) found appellant
guilty of misconduct. As penalty she was transferred from Zvishavane District Hospital to
Mberengwa District Hospital. Appellant then appealed her conviction and penalty to
respondent (Commission) who dismissed the appeal on 17th October 2023. Appellant then
appealed to this Court in terms of Section 52 of the Health Service Regulations. S.I. 117 of
2006. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
