This is an old matter, an application for review. It is undesirable that a matter should be in the dispute resolution for more than nine (9) months let alone nine years. More
This matter was brought to this court for both appeal and review purposes. However before the matter could be argued a point in limine was raised on behalf of the respondents. It was submitted that the appellant is not properly before the court. It was argued that the appellant did not comply with the award being appealed against. For that reason Mr Marimo who appeared on behalf of the respondents submitted that the appellant is in contempt of court and therefore should not be heard. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent’s employer which resulted in appellant being dismissed from work following allegations of having received money as payment for blood transfused on a patient yet such blood was obtainable for free at the hospital and for having administered the transfusion without following laid down procedure. The attack is both on the verdict and penalty. Respondent employer is opposed to grant of appellate relief citing the fact that no good case for appeal has been made out by the appellant. More
Respondents were employed by Appellant on fixed term contracts between 2009 and 2012. The contracts were renewed on an ongoing basis until 2012. Appellant is a non governmental organization funded by donors. It undertakes projects for the good of a particular community, depending on the availability of funding. Appellant’s contracts with its employees are directly related to the funding and projects that it has on a particular time. In 2012 the Respondents’ contracts came to an end and were not renewed. No other persons were employed in their place. More
