On 8 October 2009 the parties appeared before Honourable G Mhuri on appeal wherein the appellant was raising procedural irregularities and substantive issues. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the 1st respondent’s Disciplinary Authority.
In its notice of response to the appeal, 1st respondent raised and persisted with a preliminary point to the effect that 1st respondentwas improperly cited. The Minister and not the Ministry should have been cited as required under Section 3 of the State Liabilities Act [Chapter 8:14]. By citing the Ministry, appellant made a fundamental error which cannot be remedied. The Ministry is too broad which makes it impossible to be sued, so argued the respondent. More
This is a consolidated appeal of LC/H/293/2012 and LC/H/296/2012 against the decisions of the respondent works council appeal body which confirmed the appellants’ dismissal in cases where the appellants allegedly stole eleven layer boards in contravention of the respondent Code of Conduct.
Facts of the case are that the appellants who were in the respondent’s employ as loader and truck assistant respectively were on 4 December 2011 charged with the responsibility of loading a beverage truck destined for Nyameni. When the truck which they had loaded was intercepted by the respondent’s other employees it was discovered that eleven extra boards... More
