Ruziwa issued a determination. He ordered appellant (employer) to pay respondent (employee) outstanding
salaries, allowances and NSSA deductions. The employer then appealed to this Court in terms
of section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called the Act. More
The appeal was noted as against a determination of the Designated Agent for the National Employment Council (NEC) for the Rural District Councils. The determination which was handed down on the 13th of January 2013, in its operative part directed the reinstatement of the now Respondent without loss of salary and benefits or in the alternative, payment of damages for loss of employment in lieu of reinstatement. The parties were to approach this court for quantification in the event of failure to agreeon suchdamages. The Appellant was also directed to pay to Respondents their outstanding salary arrears for February, 2022,... More
Appellant was in the employ of Respondent. Appellant was dismissed for allegedly participating in an unlawful job action after a hearing. The matter was referred to arbitration and the Arbitrator upheld the decision to dismiss the Appellant. Appellant is dissatisfied and has appealed to this Court. More
Applicant was employed by Respondent as a teacher. On 23 March 2016 she was arraigned before a disciplinary authority on allegations of misconduct she was found guilty and was dismissed from employment. More
This is an application for quantification of damages for loss of employment. The application arises from a judgment handed down by MAXWELL J on 2 December 2016, the operative part of which reads, in paragraph 4, as follows:
“Respondent be and is hereby ordered to reinstate Appellant without loss of salary and benefit. If reinstatement is not an option, Respondent is to pay damages in lieu of reinstatement the quantum of which is to be agreed upon between the parties. If the parties fail to agree on the quantum either party can approach the Court for quantification.” More
