Respondent was employed by Appellant as Executive Director. It is common cause that Appellant reduced Respondent’s contracts to yearly contracts with effect from 2006. Respondent was subsequently informed of the termination of her duties on 3 November 2009. Respondent was replaced by another Executive Director who had started work prior to Respondent’s termination of contract. The matter was brought before an arbitrator who found in Respondent’s favour. However, both Appellant and Respondent are dissatisfied with the arbitrator’s decision albeit on different grounds. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Respondent Hospital’s Appeals Body which ruled that, the Appellants were guilty of contravening the Hospital’s Code of Conduct, by referring to various bodies communication about transport problems at the hospital and the acting which they intended to take in reaction to that. The act was alleged to discredit the hospital hence, the charges in question. More
The facts of the matter are that the respondent went on leave for the whole month of June. His evidence was that he was told by the employer to go on leave and the employer would call him back when they wanted him otherwise he would check with the employer when he came to collect his June salary. He was however charged with absenteeism and was found guilty and dismissed. More
