Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an appeal against the determination of the Health Service Board (the Board), which upheld the dismissal of the appellant from employment. More

This is an application for the confirmation of a ruling in the matter between Godfrey Madondo and Sun Gold Syndicate. Sun Gold is in support of the confirmation while Madondo is opposed to same. The background to the matter is that Madondo was engaged by Sun Gold as a plant manager from 1st January, 2021. After serving Sun Gold for about a year Sun Gold purportedly terminated his service on notice. Madondo was aggrieved by the termination and took his matter up with the Labour Officer. Before the Labour Officer he claimed that he had been unlawfully dismissed from employment.... More

This is an application for condonation of late filing of heads of argument. It is common cause that at the commencement of litigation between the parties applicant was represented by a trade union representative. At some stage during the litigation process, the trade union representative decided to engage the services of a legal practitioner. This firm of legal practitioners was styled Macheyo Law Chambers. It is also common cause that at a later stage, applicant’s current legal practitioners came on board and represented the applicant. During this litigation process respondent caused to be served on Macheyo Law Chambers a notice... More

This is an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator where he dismissed application for rescission of judgment filed by the now appellant in a matter where default judgment had been entered for the now respondent employer. More

This is an application for review of a decision by the respondent dismissing the applicant from its employ. The applicant was aggrieved by the following: i) That no oral evidence was called to enable him to cross examine witnesses; that there was unnecessary splitting of charges; that – the Appellant was found guilty of an offence which he was not originally charged with; that on appeal within the internal process the Appellate Tribunal was not supposed to call for evidence; that the internal review process was improperly exercised. The applicant was also aggrieved by the Disciplinary Committee’s decision to impose... More