The matter was set down in terms of rule 19(3)(a) of this court’s rules. At the time the appeal was filed Appellant was represented by Messrs Laita and Partners Legal Practitioners. Such Legal Practitioners were enjoined to file Appellant’s heads of argument upon receipt of a notice of response from the Respondent. They failed to do so. A notice of set down was sent to Appellant lawyers advising them of that day’s hearing. Appellant also confirmed that he informed his lawyers of record of the set down date. The lawyers informed Appellant that there would no longer be representing him... More
On the 17th January, 2014 Appellant noted an appeal with this court against an arbitral award. The Arbitrator had held that Appellant was not constructively dismissed. The Respondent had not committed any unfair labour practice by transferring Appellant to another department. The Respondent had simply exercised its discretion. More
The appellant was employed as a teller by the Respondent. She faced allegations of misconduct and was found guilty and dismissed. She appealed to the Local Joint Committee against the employer’s decision and the appeal was unsuccessful. She unsuccessfully appealed again to the negotiating committee. She has now noted this appeal against the decision of the negotiating committee. More
This matter has been decided by this court on the basis of the papers filed of record in terms of section 89 (2) (1) of the Labour Act. Impression created by the last dates the parties did anything about the matter is that the matter has been abandoned. More
