This is an application for stay of execution. The Registrar of Labour handed down a determination on the 7th of September 2015 which found that there was an overlap in the scope of coverage between the applicant and the first respondent. She went on to diminish the applicant’s scope of coverage by excluding toilet preparations, detergents, soaps, candles, waxes and polishes. It was directed that all companies which manufactured the aforementioned shall fall under the first respondent’s industry and that administrative arrangements be put in place to secure employee benefits. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Registrar of Labour, 1st Respondent herein. There was no appearance on behalf of the 1st respondent. The 2nd respondent opposes the appeal.
The background to this matter is that the 2nd respondent operates retail outlets. It has a number of branches. In some of its branches it operates bakeries.2nd respondent as an entity is registered with the National Employment Council for Commercial Sectors of Zimbabwe (NECCSZ). However, its instore bakeries were registered with the appellant. This was
This is an appeal against the decision of the Registrar of Labour, 1st Respondent... More
This is an application in terms of Section 46 (a) of the Labour Act, [Chapter 28:01], wherein it is sought that the Court determines under which employment council the business operations of the first respondent fall.
The Applicant is an Employment Council registered in terms of the Labour Act. It is responsible for regulating the Catering Industry in terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement: Catering Industry (General Conditions) Statutory Instrument 167 of 1991. More
In an application for the review of the decision of the Registrar of Labour the 4th respondent raised a point in limine to the effect that it had been improperly joined to the proceedings. In response to that the applicant mentioned that there was no misjoinder taking into account the fact that it was the objection by the 4th respondent at the Registrar which birthed the Registrar’s refusal to register applicant’s CBA. It is clear from the record that had it not been for the objections by the 4th respondent the applicant’s CBA would have been registered by the Registrar.... More
The Applicant seeks in this application to have reviewed the decision by the 1st and 2nd Respondents, jointly or one of them with the approval of the other to approve an investigator to investigate the affairs of the Applicant contrary to the provisions of Section 63 and Section 63A of the Labour Act [CAP 28:01] and without any other legal basis whatsoever. The 1st and 2nd Respondent announced the appointment of the investigator in a letter dated 22 January 2024 (attached as Annexure 4 to Applicant’s papers). There is attached to this letter a letter containing a complaint addressed to... More
