This is an application by a labour officer for the confirmation of a ruling made by the officer. It is in terms of section 93 (5) (a) and (b) of the Labour Act, Chapter 28:01 (hereafter referred to as the Act). 2. The 1st respondent claimed that he was employed by the 2nd respondent as a country director in November 2018. There was no written contract. He managed the 2nd respondent’s business on a daily
basis. He was not paid any salary or wages at all. After 6 months, which he said was the probation period, he wrote to the... More
Appellant was employed by Respondent as a Shift Supervisor. Appellant’s duties included issuing invoices to customers and in the absence of the cashier, also handle cash. More
This is an application for quantification of damages following disagreement on the quantum of damages between the parties.
The respondent was ordered by this Court to reinstate the applicant into her position as a shift supervisor, without loss of salary and benefits. In the event that reinstatement was no longer tenable, applicant was to be paid damages in lieu of reinstatement and for the premature loss of employment. More
This is an application for a Draft Ruling of 27th January by Labour Officer
P Mgazi. The draft ruling is couched as follows:
“In light of the above I make the following ruling.
The respondent is be and hereby ordered to reinstate the claimant without loss of salary and benefits.
The reinstatement is with effect from date of unlawful termination of contract.
I so determine.” More
This is an application for confirmation of a ruling made by the Applicant. The application is made pursuant to the provisions of Section 93(5a) and (5b) of the Labour Act [Cap 28:01] as amended. More
