Appellant was employed by the respondent as a controller. It was alleged that the appellant had negligently performed his duties and charges of misconduct were brought against him. He was brought before a Disciplinary Committee which found him guilty and dismissed him from employment. Appellant lodged his appeal in terms of the Code of Conduct. On the date the matter was scheduled to be heard, appellant raised technical issues at the commencement of the proceedings and walked out of the proceedings. The Appeals Committee proceeded to determine the matter and upheld the decision of the Disciplinary Committee. Appellant is dissatisfied... More
This is an application for condonation for late noting of appeal. The facts of the matter are as follows. The applicant was employed by the respondent. The applicant, together with other employees were charged with misconduct it being alleged that they stole from the respondent and absented themselves from work. The applicant was initially acquitted on the theft charge but was convicted on the charge of absenteeism. The applicant pleaded guilty to the charge of absenteeism. An appeal to the appeals officer resulted in the applicant being found guilty on the theft charge and he was dismissed from employment. The... More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Appeal Officer’s determination which upheld the decision to find the appellant guilty of acts of misconduct and to dismiss him.
At the hearing of the appeal the respondent’s representative raised preliminary points which challenged the grounds of appeal filed in casu. More
This is an application for condonation for late noting of an appeal and extension of time within which to note the said appeal. The background to the matter is that applicant has been before this court on numerous occasions seeking to challenge his dismissal from employment. A record two of the condonation applications were granted thus giving the impression that this court was satisfied that there was something meaningful out of the portended appeal which could detain this court.
The latest striking off order was made by the court on account of the fact that the grounds which applicant intended... More
