On 9th November 2015 at Harare, Arbitrator L. Sigauke issued an arbitration award. He dismissed Appellant’s claim of constructive dismissal from employment by Respondent. Appellant then appealed to this Court. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
On 23rd September 2010 the Honourable C. Kabasa made an arbitration award. In terms thereof he dismissed Appellant’s claims (save for a gratuity) against Respondent. Appellant then appealed to this Court against the award.
Appellant’s case was captured in the award under the sub-title “submissions.” It was a claim for reinstatement with effect from 31 October 2008. In addition he sought back-pay and benefits. Respondent countered that Appellant left his employ for a better paying job in Sudan. Upon his return, Appellant sought employment from them but none was available. The arbitrator’s analysis appears under the sub-title “Observation”. The gist... More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award handed down on 20 January 2015, in terms of which the respondent was awarded damages for loss of employment. More
This application for confirmation of ruling by the applicant is not opposed. The 1st Respondent is not opposed to the relief being sought. 1st Respondent is merely seeking to be allowed to pay off the debt in 2 to 3 months. The representative for the company indicated that they had managed to secure the funds through a loan. He said the company was having cash flow problems and because this court does not want to kill the hen that lays the golden egg the period will be extended but not up to the three months as this will severely prejudice... More
The appellant was employed by respondent as a Lecturer at Belvedere Technical Teachers’ College. Following allegations that appellant conducted income generating projects using respondent’s resources but failed to account for the money he received, he was charged on five (5) counts. Three of the charges related to the income generating projects, the fourth charge was for using an unofficial receipt book to receipt the money he received and the fifth charge was for receiving the said money when it was not in line with his duties as a lecturer. He was found liable and dismissed. More
