This is an application for stay of execution of an arbitral award, in terms of which the termination of the respondent’s employment was ruled unlawful.
The brief facts of this matter are common cause.
The respondent was employed by the appellant as its Human Capital and Administration Manager. She was so employed in a fixed term contract, which was renewed every two years for a period of eight years. At the end of October, 2013, the appellant notified the respondent that it was not going to renew the fixed term contract at its next expiry date, which was 28 February... More
The appellant appeals against an order granting him damages made in the following terms
1. Back pay $508.50
2. Vacation leave $254.25
3. Damages in lieu of reinstatement $3 051.00
In his grounds of appeal the appellant impugns the arbitral award in his
determinationof back pay, failure to award transport allowance, cash in lieu of leave and that since the respondent was not in attendance at the hearing his claim should have been granted in toto. Technically it was unopposed. More
This is an Urgent Chamber Application for Stay of Execution of an arbitral award granted by Honourable P. Chawira on 12th February 2014.
In terms of the award, the Applicant was ordered to pay an amount of US$3 500.00 as terminal benefits to the Respondent.
The Respondent proceeded to have the arbitral award registered with the Magistrates Court under case No. 3338/14, for purposes of enforcement. In pursuance of such enforcement, a Notice of Attachment in Execution was issued on 4th July 2014, in terms whereof various goods belonging to the Applicant were placed under judicial attachment, pending removal on... More
MURASI J.,
This is an Urgent Chamber Application for stay of execution pending the determination an appeal filed with this Court.
The facts are common cause. First to Fourth Respondents are former employees of the Applicant. There has been a continuing dispute between the parties as regards the Respondents’ entitlements in terms of salaries and benefits. In this particular case, the Respondents had an arbitral award granted in their favour on 10 January 2025. This is the subject of the present proceedings. More
