This was an application for review. The facts in brief are that Applicant was employed by the Respondent as a Loss Control Officer based in Mutare. Sometime in February 2022, allegations of misconduct were leveled against him leading to charges being preferred against him. He was brought before a Disci0linary Committee which found him guilty and recommended his dismissal from employment. On 31st March 2022, Applicant filed his appeal with the Appeals Officer in terms of the Respondent’s Code of Conduct. The Appeals Committee only made its determination available on 24th January 2025. Applicant is disgruntled by this outcome. In... More
1. The application for condonation for late noting of an appeal and extension of time within which to note the appeal be and is hereby dismissed with costs for lack of merit.
The matter was an application for condonation for late noting of an appeal and extension of time within which to file an appeal against a determination by Arbitrator B. Garudzo which determination was handed down on the 29th of February 2024. The application which was premised on Rule 22 of this court’s rules was opposed. More
Respondent was employed by the Appellant as a Bar Assistant/Assistant Cashier. It is alleged that Appellant verbally dismissed her resulting in the matter being referred to conciliation. Conciliation failed and the matter was referred to arbitration. The Arbitrator found in favour of the Respondent. The Appellant is not satisfied and has appealed to this Court. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. This Court on 25 November 2015 made an order dismissing the applicant’s appeal. The applicant noted an application for leave to appeal within the requisite thirty day period but that was done beforethe reasons for the judgmentwere handed down. More
This is an application in terms of rule 19(3) a of the Labour Court Rules 2006 for the dismissal of the Respondent’s appeal on the basis that he failed to file his heads of argument within the time limits prescribed by the rules.
The brief facts of the case are that the Respondent was dismissed by the Applicant on the basis of failing to obey lawful orders in contravention of the Applicant’s code of conduct. Aggrieved by his dismissal, he appealed to the Labour Court on the 20th July 2012. More
