Applicant’s application is titled “Application for Adjudication Process in terms of section 93 (7) (ii) as read with section 89 (2) ( c) of the Labour Act, (Chapter 28:01) and Labour Court Rules, 2017 More
Applicant was employed by the Respondent. He was charged for misconduct and was found guilty and was dismissed from employment. On 2 October 2013 Applicant noted an appeal in this Court. The appeal was opposed on 15 October 2013 Applicant failed to file heads of argument within the stipulated time. Respondent applied for and was granted an order in terms of Rule 19 3 (a) of the Labour Court Rules SI 59/06. More
The appellant was employed as a truck driver from 2008 until 2 October 2013 when he was dismissed. He then noted an appeal to this court.
The matter began with a letter that was handed to the respondent’s human resources department. The court was not favoured with a copy of the letter. The letter was purported to have been authored by some drivers. They set out certain grievances relating to starting times and finishing time. The appellant was one of the signatories. The appellant was a member of the worker’s committee.
After management received the letter the appellant was charged... More
Applicant applied to this Court for the review of the decision by respondents’ Disciplinary Committee to conclude his hearing without hearing his evidence. The application was made in terms of Section 89(1)1d of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. Respondents opposed the application. More
At the onset of oral argument in this matter respondents raised 2 points in limine which applicant opposed. Thes points are:
1. That the application was filed prematurely:
2. That applicant does not have the right to file the application for review More
