Applicant is seeking to be condoned for his late noting of his appeal to the labour court. The respondent employer is opposed to the grant of the condonation relief.
The background to the matter is that following a hearing into the employee’s matter at his workplace the appeals officer directed him to appeal to the labour relation officer. For that the appeals officer cited SI 15/06. It is only when the employee presented before the Labour Relation Officer that he was advised that he was in the wrong forum. By that time he was out of time to appeal to... More
This is an application for condonation of the late filing of an application for review.
The brief facts are as follows. Applicant was in the employ of the Respondent. He fell ill and was granted sick leave in October 2018. After the initial three months on such leave, Applicant was granted a further three months as provided in the Act. Applicant did not report for duty at the end of the second period. Respondent wrote to Applicant in June 2019 informing him that his employment was being terminated with effect from the end of that month. Applicant thereafter filed a... More
This is an application for condonation of late filing of an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. On 29 May 2015 this court upheld a point in limine that the grounds of appeal in case number LC/H/1056/14 are attacking factual findings without alleging that the findings are grossly irregular amounting to a misdirection in law. Consequently I dismissed the appeal with costs. On 27 July 2015 the present application was filed. The applicant alleges that the judgment of 29 may 2015 was not brought to her attention on time as it was only delivered to her on... More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award made in favour of the respondents.
The three respondents were employed by the appellant in different capacities on fixed term contracts of one month at a time. The contracts were continuously renewed to the extent that the first respondent worked for appellant for a period of 7 years 6 months, the second respondent worked for 1 year 3 months and the third respondent worked for 1 year 7 months. On
30 September 2010 the three respondents were advised by the appellant orally after work not to report for duty the following day... More
The brief history of this matter is that the respondents were employed by the appellant. It is alleged that the respondents made a report at Mega Park and when an audit report was carried out the report was found to be false. They were suspended from duty on 4 November 2010 on allegations of making a false report. A disciplinary hearing was conducted and the respondents were dismissed from work. More
