Electronic Court judgements

Browse Court Judgements by court

It is not clear who is alleged to have violated the afore-quoted provisions. Was it the respondent? Further it is not clear how the provisions were allegedly violated. This raised questions about the validity of the Notice of Appeal. The notice is required to have cognizable grounds of appeal. The notice in casu is very vague to say the least. Such notice should not leave the Court to speculate on what it is that the appellant requires to be determined by the Court. It is the duty of the appellant to set out clear, concise and cognizable grounds of appeal.... More

This is an appeal in which the respondent has raised a point in limine. In submissions on behalf of the respondent the point was raised that the appeal is not properly before this Court. This was submitted in view of the initial citation of one of the parties. The respondent submitted that the “Ministry of Home Affairs” is not a competent party because it is not a legal persona. (See Gariya Safaris (Pvt) Ltd v Van Wyke 1996(2) ZLR 246(H).I agree with that submission and the authorities cited. More

This is an appeal against the decision of Honourable arbitrator J N Simango that was handed down on 13 January 2013. More

On 6 June 2014 this Court allowed an appeal by the Respondent against an arbitral award in favour of Applicant. More

On the 11th March 2016 the applicant filed in this court, an application for condonation of late noting of his application for rescission. The respondent opposed the application. I will deal with the application under the subtitles “Delay” and “Prospects”. More