Appellant was employed as a teacher at St. Killian’s School. He is alleged to have committed acts of misconduct which resulted in him being brought before a Disciplinary Committee. The Disciplinary Committee found him guilty on certain of the charges and recommended his dismissal. Appellant is dissatisfied with this decision and has appealed to this Court. More
Appellant worked for Respondent as a Headmistress at Dzivarasekwa in Harare. She was transferred to another school. An audit was conducted which led to charges of misconduct being leveled against her. A hearing was held which found her guilty of misconduct. As a result, she was dismissed from employment by Respondent. She then appealed to this Court against her dismissal. Appellant faced a number of charges. Her argument in this Court was that Respondent failed to prove its case against her. In essence she sought to have this Court give its determination on the evidence on record. More
The Appellant in this case was charged with two offences i.e gross incompetence or inefficiency in the performance of his work and theft or fraud. He was found guilty and dismissed from employment. He appealed to the designated authority. The appeal was dismissed and he noted this current appeal to the Labour Court. More
The brief facts are that the Appellant was employed as an agent or dealer of the Respondent. On 25 October 2010 Appellant was suspended from employment using SI 15/06. He was suspended on allegations of contravening sections 4 (a), (b), (d) and (f) of SI 15 of 2006. He appeared before a hearing which found him guilty and dismissed him from employment. Appellant referred the matter for conciliation. There was no settlement resulting in the matter being referred for arbitration. The Arbitrator confirmed Appellant’s dismissal from employment. More
The appellant appealed to the Appeals Committee, in terms of the appellant company’s Code of Conduct (the Code). The appeal, which was lodged on 10 January 2011, was out of time, in terms of the timelines stipulated by the Code. On 15 March 2011, the Appeals Committee refused to hear appellant’s appeal, as it was out of time. More
