The Appellant called at his supervisor’s house Mr Tinarwo on Saturday 26th June, 2004 and told him that he wanted to travel to Hwedza to do a spot check of some deliveries. The supervisor authorised him to take a Mazda B 1800 PWD 59 SC but said he should be accompanied by a driver. The Appellant suggested that he be accompanied by another officer, Mr Muchadakuenda, since drivers were not available. More
This is an appeal against an arbitration award made in favour of the respondent.
The appellant was employed by the respondent company stationed at Beitbridge border post. It was alleged that during the course of his duties respondent cleared on behalf of the respondent certain motor vehicles without payment of the requisite fees to the Respondent contrary to laid down procedures. He was charged and appeared before a disciplinary committee, which found him liable and subsequently dismissed. By letter dated June 13 2011 Appellant was advised of the outcome of the disciplinary hearing. In the same letter he was advised... More
The background to the matter is that on 18 March 2016 the Labour Court dismissed an appeal in a labour matter involving the applicant and the respondent employer. It is the dismissal of the appeal which has prompted the applicant to apply to this court for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in terms of Section 92 (f) Labour Court Act. The basis for the application is that the applicant is of the view that a dismissal penalty was not in place for the infraction he committed of causing his motor vehicle to be repaired on the employer’s account... More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent employer’s appeals committee where it upheld the appellant employee’s guilty verdict and dismissal penalty.
Facts giving rise to the case were that the appellant who was in the respondent’s employ as a line supervisor was charged with contravening the respondent Code of Conduct. It was alleged that he had caused his personal motor vehicle to be repaired on an order to the charge of the respondent More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent’s Disciplinary and Grievance Committee(Appeals Committee) which upheld the appellant’s dismissal from employment. More
