This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. This court dismissed an appeal by the applicant against dismissal on the basis that it had been done in terms of section 63 (e) of the Public Service Regulations, 2000, as amended. Applicant had failed to resume duty after the expiry of his suspension on 29 June 2011 and was absent from duty for a continuous period in excess of thirty days. More
This is an appeal against the dismissal of the appellant in terms of section 63 (e) of the Public Services Regulations, 2000, as amended. The appellant failed to resume duty after the expiry of his suspension on 29 June 2011 and was absent from duty for a continuous period in excess of thirty days. Section 63 (e) of the Public Service Regulations, 2000, allows the Commission or head of Ministry to discharge from the Public Service any member who:
“has been absent from duty for a continuous period in excess of thirty days without having been granted leave of absence.” More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award where the arbitrator ruled that, the Appellants were casual workers and ordered that they be paid the amounts that they were short-charged on their casual work basis. More
This is an application forcondonation for late noting of an application for review.
When the matter came up for hearing, a preliminary point was taken by the 2nd respondent. It argued that the draft ruling being sought to be taken on review has no legal force until after its confirmation when it is made an order of the court.
The 2nd respondent submitted, in support of the preliminary point that it had raised, that the application is improperly before the court as it is based on nothing. The proceedings which are sought to be challenged cannot be taken on appeal... More
The Appellant called at his supervisor’s house Mr Tinarwo on Saturday 26th June, 2004 and told him that he wanted to travel to Hwedza to do a spot check of some deliveries. The supervisor authorised him to take a Mazda B 1800 PWD 59 SC but said he should be accompanied by a driver. The Appellant suggested that he be accompanied by another officer, Mr Muchadakuenda, since drivers were not available. More
