This matter, an application for condonation of late noting of an application for review was brought for my consideration in chambers. There was no response filed by 5 July 2016 when I considered the application.
I dismissed the application. The applicant has requested reasons for my ruling. These are they.
I found that the delay in noting the application was inordinate. The applicant was discharged from service on 8 October 2007. He became aware of the discharge in October 2007 but only filed the current application on 18 May 2016. The nine year delay is inordinate. More
The record shows two actions that the appellant took, following the decision of the respondent’s Disciplinary Authority to dismiss her from employment. The Disciplinary Authority found the appellant guilty of misconduct in terms of the Labour (National Employment Code of Conduct) Regulations, S I 15 of 2006. More
The appellant was employed by the respondent as a senior teller. Following suspicions that she disclosed confidential information to certain individuals. She was charged. She was charged with two acts of misconduct disclosing confidential information obtained in the course of one’s duties and violating safety rules or measures with serious consequences. The designated officer found her liable after considering the evidence and dismissed the appellant. Appellant appealed to the Mashonaland Local Joint Committee which upheld the decision of the Designated Officer. Dissatisfied by the decision appellant approached the Negotiating Committee on appeal. The Negotiating Committee upheld the dismissal of the... More
This is an appeal against the decision of the National employment Council for the Engineering and Iron and Steel Industry where it ordered that the Respondent employee be reinstated by the Appellant employee without any loss of salary or benefits from the date of his suspension or alternatively that he be paid damages in place of the reinstatement. More
