This judgment is for three matters which were heard separately but with similar facts. The Respondents were employed by the Appellant. Allegations are that they were jointly charged and convicted of theft. A penalty of dismissal was imposed. Respondents appealed to the NEC for the Plastics Manufacturing Industry. The NEC determined the matters individually resulting in three determinations being issued nullifying the dismissal of the Respondents and reinstating them without loss of salary and benefits. Appellant was aggrieved and appealed against each of the determinations. Three records were opened in this Court. More
Appellants were former employees of the Central African Power Corporation (CAPCO). They were transferred to the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA) as security guards. After the transfer they worked until January 2012 when they were retired in terms of the ZESA Pension Fund Rules. Appellants disputed their retirement arguing that the applicable pension rules were the CAPCO Pension Fund Rules. In terms of the ZESA Pension Fund Rules the retirement age is 60 years while in terms of the CAPCO Pension Fund Rules it is 65 years. More
The appeal is noted against the determination handed down on 24 March, 2011 by Respondent’s Disciplinary Committee which found the Appellant guilty of reselling tickets and consequently imposed a dismissal penalty.
The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a conductor. The Respondent’s case was that on the 5th of December 2010 a Risk Controller, MrMutizwa upon checking tickets found 4 passengers with resold tickets in a bus Appellant wasoperating as Conductor. The Appellant was suspended verbally on the same day 5th of December, 2010. He was then notified on 24th March, 2011 of the date of Disciplinary Hearing, which... More
This is an application by a labour officer for confirmation of his ruling on a matter between the respondents. It is in terms of section 93 (5a) (a) and (b) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 (the Act). More
