Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an application for review by the applicant. The basis for the application is that the respondent company hastily concluded negotiations pertaining to his exit from his job to the extent that he felt that he was coerced into accepting the final settlement which saw him exiting the respondent company .It is therefore his prayer that this court directs the respondent company to renegotiate his exit package. More

This is an application for reinstatement of an application for quantification of damages. Preliminary issues were raised on behalf of the respondent before the main application could be argued. More

This judgment is in respect of an application for review (LC/H/REV/75/19 and an appeal (LC/H/170/19) filed by the applicant/appellant on the 7th August, 2019. Respondents raised preliminary issues in respect of both and it is these, that this judgment addresses. Applicant was employed as headmaster under the 2nd respondent and was based at Chibara Primary School. More

This is an application for condonation to enable the applicant to file its appeal against the decision of the labour officer out of time. The respondent raised a preliminary point and argued that the new Amendment Act No. 5/2015 does not allow for the procedure adopted by the applicant. The new provisions do not provide for an appeal against the decision of a labour officer nor for an application to the Labour Court. It was argued that the Labour Court is a creature of statute and cannot do anything outside the four corners of the parent Act. The Labour Act... More

This is an application for rescission of a judgment entered against the applicant. An order was made dismissing the application. The following are the reasons for the dismissal. At the commencement of the hearing a preliminary issue was raised on behalf of the respondent regarding timeous filing of heads of argument on behalf of the applicant. The complaint was that they were filed a day out of time. Ms Banga who appeared on behalf of the applicant produced proof that they were filed after close of business on the last day of the time limit. This is why they were... More