The brief facts are that the Appellant was employed as an agent or dealer of the Respondent. On 25 October 2010 Appellant was suspended from employment using SI 15/06. He was suspended on allegations of contravening sections 4 (a), (b), (d) and (f) of SI 15 of 2006. He appeared before a hearing which found him guilty and dismissed him from employment. Appellant referred the matter for conciliation. There was no settlement resulting in the matter being referred for arbitration. The Arbitrator confirmed Appellant’s dismissal from employment. More
The appellant appealed to the Appeals Committee, in terms of the appellant company’s Code of Conduct (the Code). The appeal, which was lodged on 10 January 2011, was out of time, in terms of the timelines stipulated by the Code. On 15 March 2011, the Appeals Committee refused to hear appellant’s appeal, as it was out of time. More
This is an application for condonation of late filing of an appeal. The application arises out of a determination handed down by the respondent’s Disciplinary Authority on 6 August 2019 More
This is an appeal against a determination by the Respondent Appeals Committee which determination was handed down on 7th of November, 2019. The appeal is opposed.
The material background facts to the matter are as follows. The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Senior Manager. The Respondent levelled a charge of misconduct against her for participating in a procurement meeting where she along with the other members of the Committee, were said to have violated Section 52 (1) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act [Cap 22:23]hereinafter referred to as the “PPDPA Act”. More
The brief facts to this dispute are as follows;
On 6June 2012 Honourable Arbitrator M.C. Kare gave an award the effect of which was that the employer was to pay Appellant a total sum of US$6 422, 00 for unlawfully dismissing him.
On 21June 2012, the Appellant approached the Arbitrator seeking an additional award. On 2July, the Arbitrator turned down the request and advised the Appellant to appeal to the Labour Court if he was dissatisfied with the award.
On 11July 2012 the Appellant noted an appeal against the award with the Labour Court.
On 13November 2012, Appellant entered into... More
