Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is a matter which was supposed to be disposed of in Chambers in terms of Rule 19(3)(a) of the Rules of this Court. However, when the applicant lodged the application for dismissal of the appeal, the record of proceedings was in bad shape. I therefore instructed the Registrar’s Office to have the record properly arranged and paginated. After the completion of that process and out of extreme caution I asked that the matter be set down for a hearing More

This is an appeal against an arbitral award. The appellant lodged his appeal on 22 September 2014. A response to the appeal was duly filed on 28 October 2014. Both parties are not legally represented. More

This is an application for condonation of late noting of appeal. It is opposed. Two preliminary issues were taken on behalf of the respondent before the application could be argued. These have to be determined before the main application is heard as they may have the ability to dispose of the matter and therefore obviate the need to determine the merits .See TELECEL Zimbabwe (Private) Limited v Postal and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe and Others HH446/15.The two issues are that (i) the matter has prescribed and (ii) the application is defective. More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Negotiating Committee of the National Employment Council for the Commercial Sectors which confirmed on appeal, an earlier dismissal verdict from employment of Appellant by the Mashonaland Local Joint Committee. The Appellant was employed by Respondent as a security guard and at the material time he was guarding at the main gate at AfdisSoutherton. Appellant was charged for dishonesty and other related offences, in particular, theft in terms of the Code of Conduct for the Commercial Sectors. It has alleged that he had stolen a 750 mls bottle of Amarula and another... More

Applicant applied to this Court for rescission of judgment which Respondent opposed. The application was made in terms of section 92C of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 as read with Rule 40 of the Labour Court Rules S.I. 150 of 2017. The material facts are set out hereafter. More