In the exercise of its functions, the Labour Court may conduct a hearing into the matter or determine it on the record. See Section 89 (2)(a)(i) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]. This appeal has proceeded in terms of the above section. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award made in favour of the respondent.
The facts of the case are not in dispute. The appellant was employed by the respondent as a Chief Internal Auditor. According to the appellant on 6 February 2012 he was suspended for contravening the respondent’s Code of Conduct. It was alleged that the appellant wilfully lost council property and secondly for engaging in behaviour likely to harm the financial position of the council. More
Applicant applied to this Court for rescission of judgement in terms of section 92C of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 as read with Rule of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. Respondent opposed the application. More
This matter was set down as an application for quantification of damages arising from an order of 16 October 2015 where the Labour Court ordered that the labour matter pitting the applicant and the respondent employer be heard de novo at arbitration after it was observed that the arbitral award had been a terse award divorced from the shop floor proceedings in the matter. More
This matter was set down as an application for quantification of damages due to the applicant employee following a labor dispute pitting him and the respondent employer. More
