Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
At the hearing of this matter the respondent raised preliminary issues and these were that: 1. The appellant had not been formally served with the appeal and only got to know of it from the Registrar. 2. The appellant was not served with their notice of assumption of agency. 3. The appellant failed to file their heads of arguments as is required by the rules of this court. 4. The grounds of appeal raise no point of law. More

Before me is an appeal against an arbitral award which found that appellant was not constructively dismissed but resigned. It ordered that terminal benefits be paid. More

This is an application for condonation of late filing of an application for confirmation of a ruling issued by the Applicant in the dispute between the1stand 2nd Respondent. The application is opposed by the 1st Respondent. The 2nd Respondent has not responded to the application. The 2nd Respondent, was also in default on the date of the hearing despite proper service having been effected on her. More

The Applicant is a former employee of the 1st Respondent. He was employed in the capacity of ICT Manager in April 2012. On the 5th of July 2021 the 1st Respondent served him with a suspension letter and a charge sheet. The 1st Respondent levelled a charge of breach of section 4(a) of the Labour (National Employment Code of Conduct) Regulations 2006 (Statutory Instrument 15 of 2006) i.e. (a) any act or conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conditions of (your) contract. More

This is an application for review based on the following grounds:- 1. The Respondent without following due process of law withheld applicant’s salary from October 2019 when he was not sitting on a suspension without pay, court order or termination of employment. 2. The decision of the Respondent to dismiss applicant whilst he was sick and bed ridden was unprocedural and violates the principle of natural justice and constitutes a serious procedural impropriety which violates principles of natural justice particularly the audialterampartem principle. 3. The Respondent committed gross procedural irregularities by convicting and dismissing applicant against the medical report advising... More