The appellant was employed as a Restaurant Supervisor by the respondent. She was dismissed from employment following disciplinary proceedings. Aggrieved by that outcome she appeals to this Court on the following grounds and I quote:
“1. The court a quo misdirected itself on the fact (sic) in holding that the Appellant was guilty of misconduct (sic) inconsistent with the contract of employment.
2. The court a quo erred at law by finding the Appellant guilty of a matter that had no evidence or proof. If the complainant was aggrieved should have raised a grievance (sic).
3. The court a quo... More
This is an application for reinstatement of an application for condonation of late filing of heads of argument. It is opposed.
Background
On 14 October 2010 this same application was placed before the court. The parties to the matter are Tariro Takawira v (1) NEC for Schools Development Association and Committees’ Appeals Committee. 2. SDA Dudley Hall Primary School. More
At the onset of this appeal the appellant employee sought to amend his relief which he felt he had worked badly. He also sought to have the court impugn what he
styled the belatedly filed Heads of Argument by the respondent employer. It is only these two issues which are addressed by this judgment. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award.
The respondent was employed by the appellant as a till operator from 20 August 2010 to 30 June 2013. He claimed he was unfairly dismissed when he was put on leave without pay and returned to find that the respondent had closed the place of business he was operating from. More
1. This is an appeal against the decision of the judgment of the Appeal Committee at the workplace. The appellant was charged of 4 and convicted of 2 charges of acts of misconduct in terms of the employment code. A penalty of dismissal was imposed. The appeal is against both conviction and penalty. More
